On 07/30/2011 03:34 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 18:24 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> How do you plan to handle x32, if it ever makes it to mainline ? > > I was pondering that. Surely it would involve porting the kernel itself > to x32? And there's never going to be any motivation for that *other* > than UML, so I can't really see it happening. > > What does 'uname -m' give under x32, anyway? Right now is gives x86_64, but that should probably be changed before mainlining. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
