On 07/30/2011 03:17 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 15:03 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> It isn't meaningless for exactly that reason. For example, >> "make ARCH=x86 USERARCH=i386" and "make ARCH=x86 USERARCH=x86_64" both >> make sense. Similarly, "make ARCH=um USERARCH=i386" is different from >> "make ARCH=um USERARCH=x86_64". > > In that case it's redundant with CONFIG_64BIT, isn't it? Yes, but some architectures have more than one ABI for a particular bitness. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
