Hi, On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:28:05 +0200 Michal Marek wrote: > >> Dne 26.7.2011 17:04, Randy Dunlap napsal(a): >> > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:21:39 +0200 Michal Marek wrote: >> >> On 26.7.2011 15:01, Américo Wang wrote: >> >>> BTW, the name KCONFIG(CONFIG_NUMA) seems ugly. >> >> >> >> Suggest a better one :). The proposals so far: >> >> config_is_numa() (breaks grep) >> > >> > explain, please. >> >> If you grep for CONFIG_FOO usage, you'll miss this alternate syntax. >> > > Ack. > >> >> >> CONFIGURED(CONFIG_NUMA) >> >> ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) >> >> KCONFIG(CONFIG_NUMA) >> > >> > CONFIG(NUMA) || CONFIG(NUMA_BUILTIN) || CONFIG(NUMA_MODULE) >> >> same problem. > > Yes, I sorta got that after I sent the email. > > I guess I prefer your ENABLED() syntax then. > we need to be careful about namespace pollution/collision. - Arnaud -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
