On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:28:05 +0200 Michal Marek wrote: > Dne 26.7.2011 17:04, Randy Dunlap napsal(a): > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:21:39 +0200 Michal Marek wrote: > >> On 26.7.2011 15:01, Américo Wang wrote: > >>> BTW, the name KCONFIG(CONFIG_NUMA) seems ugly. > >> > >> Suggest a better one :). The proposals so far: > >> config_is_numa() (breaks grep) > > > > explain, please. > > If you grep for CONFIG_FOO usage, you'll miss this alternate syntax. > Ack. > > >> CONFIGURED(CONFIG_NUMA) > >> ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) > >> KCONFIG(CONFIG_NUMA) > > > > CONFIG(NUMA) || CONFIG(NUMA_BUILTIN) || CONFIG(NUMA_MODULE) > > same problem. Yes, I sorta got that after I sent the email. I guess I prefer your ENABLED() syntax then. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
