On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 07:00:26PM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote: > > > Am 3. Dezember 2018 18:55:46 MEZ schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 09:55:09AM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 10:29:22AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > >> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 04:01:38PM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote: > >> > > >> > > The only thing I would want to get rid of are the *1.1b based* > >> > > drivers - they are probably end of life since quite some time. > >The > >> > > TIS driver&specification has been around since 2005 if not > >longer... > >> > > >> > I also wanted to do this, I feel like these drivers probably don't > >> > work any more after all the churn in the past few years.. > >> > >> I'm with you on this but yeah, better to do it now so that it gets > >> maximum exposure in linux-next (i.e. would land to 4.22). > > > >And superimportat to CC this commit also to LSM. > > > >/Jarkko > Correct would be to move them to stagimg first. > See my thread on ksummit-discuss for details. I thought we decided not to do that anymore? Linus said just delete them. If someone wants it back then git-revert will do the job. If you want to do partways then flag the kconfig entries with CONFIG_BROKEN for a cycle.. Jason
