Re: TPM legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 15:35 -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Some things that came up at LSS.
> 
> First, would it be time to drop 1.1b bits? What advantages this would
> bring? AFAIK Peter is a strong supporter of this.
> 
> In the hall way discussions, I talked with Tomas Winkler that it would
> make sense to add CONFIG_TCG_TPM1 flag to completely leave out all TPM
> 1.x bits from the kernel.
> 
> TPM 1.x stuff is not exactly legacy but especially on IoT does not make
> sense to carry that code with.

New systems might be shipping with only TPM 2.0, but it still needs to
be supported for existing systems, probably for quite a while.  Having
the option to build the kernel with TPM 1.2, TPM 2.0 or both, is
acceptable.

Mimi




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux