On 3/20/2018 9:11 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 15:01 +0000, Martin Townsend wrote: >> Not sure why SMACK is not already there, do you want me to submit this >> patch formally or is there a good reason for the omission? > At some point, we should introduce a flag indicating a pseudo > fileesystem, but for now including SMACK in the list of pseudo > filesystems not measured sounds right. I am also good with that. > > thanks, > > Mimi > >
