On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 15:01 +0000, Martin Townsend wrote: > > Not sure why SMACK is not already there, do you want me to submit this > patch formally or is there a good reason for the omission? At some point, we should introduce a flag indicating a pseudo fileesystem, but for now including SMACK in the list of pseudo filesystems not measured sounds right. thanks, Mimi
