On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 07:18:25PM +0000, Shaikh, Azhar wrote: > Having a wider range would mean clocks running for a bit longer > duration than current implementation, which might have power > implications, minimal though, would be good if we could avoid it > from here :-) Also since this patch has already passed rigorous > testing as mentioned earlier, hence would be good if we have the > current implementation as it is. I'll leave it to you then! Jason
