On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:24:34PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:27:37AM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote: > > > >Updating that file goes out of my territory other than acking the > > >updates. > > > Imho not really, since there is no MAINTAINERS maintainer. If you > > feel uncomfortable with adding the changes to MAINTAINERS via your > > tree, please ask James to pull them up - just as Mimi did for her > > linux-integrity update. > > Agreed, if you are submitting pull requests then the MAINTAINERS > update for TPM related things should go into your pull request. That > is appropriate.. > > It isn't necessary for everything to be cc'd everywhere, ultimately it > is your responsibility as the TPM maintainer to accept/reject this > change. > > If it was a larger change, like adding/removing a maintainer then a > large audiance would be appropriate, but this is just changing > spelling and the patch was PGP signed .. > > Jason Agreed. I'll apply this after my previous change is available. /Jarkko