On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:27:37AM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote: > > > Am 8. November 2017 07:36:40 MEZ schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 05:03:56PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 05:05:49PM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > Am 3. November 2017 15:28:41 MEZ schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen > ><jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> > >On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 02:23:57PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > >> > >> My email address for open source work is moving to this new > >permanent > >> > >> personal address. > >> > >> > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxx> > >> > >> --- > >> > >> MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > >> > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> > >> > >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > >> > >> index 6671f375f7fcdd..b79eb071475ffc 100644 > >> > >> --- a/MAINTAINERS > >> > >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS > >> > >> @@ -13588,7 +13588,7 @@ TPM DEVICE DRIVER > >> > >> M: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@xxxxxx> > >> > >> M: Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> M: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> -R: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> +R: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> > >> > >> W: http://tpmdd.sourceforge.net > >> > >> L: tpmdd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated for > >non-subscribers) > >> > >> Q: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/tpmdd-devel/list/ > >> > >> -- > >> > >> 2.7.4 > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > > >> > >Should these updates go to my tree? I posted previous update to > >> > >linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. > >> > Which equals /dev/null for most cases. > >> > > >> > Why shouldn'tit go through your tree? > >> > It's a maintainers update for your subsystem - and you did it in > >the past when modifying the urls. > >> > > >> > >/Jarkko > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Sent from my mobile > >> > >> I applied two patches to my tree. > >> > >> /Jarkko > > > >NAK > > > NAK what? > Who/what do you nak to? > > >linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is missing *completely*. It should be at > >minimum in the CC field. > > > >My previous update did not go through my tree. I misread your original > >response to say that I should put also URL update to my tree. I did. > >It resulted a merge conflict. > > > I do not understand what you are saying. > Please rephrase/clarify. > > >Updating that file goes out of my territory other than acking the > >updates. > Imho not really, since there is no MAINTAINERS maintainer. > If you feel uncomfortable with adding the changes to MAINTAINERS via > your tree, please ask James to pull them up - just as Mimi did for her > linux-integrity update. I'm just saying that the previous update did not go my tree but I can queue this one to my tree given your comments. I just have to wait up until the previous MAINTAINERS update is visible in the security tree. /Jarkko
