Am 8. November 2017 07:36:40 MEZ schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 05:03:56PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 05:05:49PM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote: >> > >> > >> > Am 3. November 2017 15:28:41 MEZ schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen ><jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> > >On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 02:23:57PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> > >> My email address for open source work is moving to this new >permanent >> > >> personal address. >> > >> >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxx> >> > >> --- >> > >> MAINTAINERS | 2 +- >> > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> >> > >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> > >> index 6671f375f7fcdd..b79eb071475ffc 100644 >> > >> --- a/MAINTAINERS >> > >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> > >> @@ -13588,7 +13588,7 @@ TPM DEVICE DRIVER >> > >> M: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@xxxxxx> >> > >> M: Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> M: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> -R: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> +R: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> >> > >> W: http://tpmdd.sourceforge.net >> > >> L: tpmdd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated for >non-subscribers) >> > >> Q: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/tpmdd-devel/list/ >> > >> -- >> > >> 2.7.4 >> > >> >> > > >> > >Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > > >> > >Should these updates go to my tree? I posted previous update to >> > >linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. >> > Which equals /dev/null for most cases. >> > >> > Why shouldn'tit go through your tree? >> > It's a maintainers update for your subsystem - and you did it in >the past when modifying the urls. >> > >> > >/Jarkko >> > >> > -- >> > Sent from my mobile >> >> I applied two patches to my tree. >> >> /Jarkko > >NAK > NAK what? Who/what do you nak to? >linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is missing *completely*. It should be at >minimum in the CC field. > >My previous update did not go through my tree. I misread your original >response to say that I should put also URL update to my tree. I did. >It resulted a merge conflict. > I do not understand what you are saying. Please rephrase/clarify. >Updating that file goes out of my territory other than acking the >updates. Imho not really, since there is no MAINTAINERS maintainer. If you feel uncomfortable with adding the changes to MAINTAINERS via your tree, please ask James to pull them up - just as Mimi did for her linux-integrity update. >Now that linux-kernel is missing this completely unacceptable. > >/Jarkko -- Sent from my mobile
