On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 12:27:22PM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 12:19 PM Benjamin Tissoires > <benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 11:35 AM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 12:34:30PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:51:04AM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > > > > > On Aug 21 2023, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > > > > > Long story short, I'm not able to test it right now (and I got quite > > > > > some backlog as you can imagine). IIRC the code was fine, so I think we > > > > > can just take the series as is, and work on the quirks (if any) later. > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > > > The thing that might be broken is interrupts handling. If that works, > > > > I'm pretty confident with the rest. > > > > > > I.o.w. first 5 patches to test is already 98% of guarantee that everything > > > is fine. > > > > Actually I applied you series locally, and applied Danny's patches on > > top, and I could run your series in qemu with the cp2112 as USB > > passthrough. > > > > Everything is working fine, so I can take this one just now. > > I've pushed the series to for-6.6/cp2112, but for some reasons, b4 > doesn't seem to believe the series is the one you submitted. > > Would you mind double checking on your side if everything is good? > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hid/hid.git/log/?h=for-6.6/cp2112 Everything is fine as far as I can tell. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
