On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 12:19:39PM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 11:35 AM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 12:34:30PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:51:04AM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > > > > On Aug 21 2023, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > > > > Long story short, I'm not able to test it right now (and I got quite > > > > some backlog as you can imagine). IIRC the code was fine, so I think we > > > > can just take the series as is, and work on the quirks (if any) later. > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > The thing that might be broken is interrupts handling. If that works, > > > I'm pretty confident with the rest. > > > > I.o.w. first 5 patches to test is already 98% of guarantee that everything > > is fine. > > Actually I applied you series locally, and applied Danny's patches on > top, and I could run your series in qemu with the cp2112 as USB > passthrough. > > Everything is working fine, so I can take this one just now. Thank you! I assume you have some IRQ (like GPIO button) to test with that. If no, it's easily to describe (in ACPI, see [1]) and use a wire to emulate the button presses. In that case the /proc/interrupts should show the different numbers. [1]: https://github.com/westeri/meta-acpi/blob/master/recipes-bsp/acpi-tables/samples/edison/buttons.asli -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
