On 16.05.2017 10:18, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Arek Burdach <arek.burdach@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Benjamin,
I found out what was wrong in the change that you've provided:
On 12.05.2017 16:28, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
+ if (td->mtclass.quirks & MT_QUIRK_STICKY_FINGERS)
+ mod_timer(&td->release_timer, msecs_to_jiffies(250));
}
Should be:
mod_timer(&td->release_timer, jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(100));
Right, thanks!
Delay should be added to current jiffies value. Also I found out that 250 ms
is too long delay - xserver recognize such a delay as a drag gesture. Using
100 ms everything works perfectly!
Does 160 ms works too?
160 ms works too but I have a feeling that values closer to 200 ms gives
quite a laggy experience so I'd suggest to keep value closer to 100 ms.
Beside that I haven't seen situation that "normal" syn_report have been
repored after longer delay than 30 ms. Mean value is 9 ms and 95 pp ~10
ms (tested by drags with evemu-record)
I'd rather have 10 times the maximum time
between 2 reports than 6.25 times it :)
We can use 96 ms if 160 doesn't work.
In fact 100 ms it is exactly 6 times the maximum time between 2 reports,
because 60 Hz frequency gives 16,(6) ms period
What do you think that should be changed
more in the patch to make it ready for being submitted as an official patch?
Not much actually. I need to wrote down a commit message, sign it
(your sign-off-by can also be added given that you debugged it), and
that should be it.
I thought about some unit tests, but can't find any for hid drivers also I
I have a test suite that can emulate hid devices and inject them in
hid-multitouch. The setup is a little bit manual, so I'll try to run
it today and see if there are differences with or without the patch.
Ok, waiting for signed patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
