On Tue, Mar 3, 2015, at 13:52, Darren Hart wrote: > Henrique, I believe I may have overstepped with thinkpad-acpi and dealt > with it like the other drivers in platform/drivers/x86, when instead I should > have been leaving it to you. My apologies, it was not intentional. No harm done! And I did appreciate the extra help :-) > Do you typically send pull-requests for the thinkpad-acpi driver directly to Linus? thinkpad-acpi is part of the platform-x86 subsystem, so IMHO it should continue to be merged through your tree if you are okay with that. I'd really appreciate if the typical patch approval flux would go through me first. However, I certainly don't mind if you merge patches directly should I be unresponsible for some reason, or when they are part of the usual tree-wide spot fixes for some pattern/anti-pattern, etc. > I would be more than happy to basically ignore anything to thinkpad-acpi until > after you have provided a review. I can also roll up pull requests from > you if you prefer to integrate into the platform-drivers-x86 tree as the path to > Linus. Well, if it is fine with you, I'd suggest we continue with the process used in this patchset, where I will reply to patches in this ML with a reviewed-by or acked-by before you merge them. If you want to change that at some point, just drop me a note and I will start pushing patches to you either through this ML or through signed pull requests, whichever you prefer. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
