On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:43:02PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Note I'd also like a much more detailed description in the patch header.
>
> I would also expect an option for the trigger to be supplied from the
> chip itself based on fifo watershead interrupts. Thus the adc could be
> operated at full rate without losing data. As you described in a previous
> email this is much more similar to a one shot osciloscope trigger where it
> grabs the next set of readings. Now this is an interesting option, but
> it isn't the standard one for IIO. I'd be interested to see a proposal
> for adding this functionality to the core in a more general fashion.
When I read trigger, this functionality is what comes to my mind.
Not the single scan current implementation in IIO. My background I guess.
Adding this feature to the core feels a bit above my level at the moment.
I'd like to get this driver sorted first.
>
> For now I'd be much happier if this driver conformed to more or less the
> standard form with the one exception being that the 'trigger' is based on
> the fifo threshold and so it might appear to grab multiple scans of the
> enabled channels for each trigger (which is fine). Even if we provide the
> functionality sketched out above, it would still be as core functionality, not
> in the driver as you have done here.
>
> Jonathan
Will that affect the way generic_buffer.c will read from the driver?
Rest comments below.
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
> > + /* FIFO Overrun. Clear flag. Disable/Enable ADC to recover */
> > + if (status & IRQENB_FIFO1OVRRUN) {
> > + config = tiadc_readl(adc_dev, REG_CTRL);
> > + config &= ~(CNTRLREG_TSCSSENB);
> > + tiadc_writel(adc_dev, REG_CTRL, config);
> > + tiadc_writel(adc_dev, REG_IRQSTATUS, IRQENB_FIFO1OVRRUN |
> > + IRQENB_FIFO1UNDRFLW | IRQENB_FIFO1THRES);
> > + tiadc_writel(adc_dev, REG_CTRL, (config | CNTRLREG_TSCSSENB));
> > + } else if (status & IRQENB_FIFO1THRES) {
>
> I'd normally expect this interrupt to drive a trigger that in turn results in
> the data being dumped into the software buffers.
>
The work handler is sort of providing similar functionality..
But, I guess using the trigger ABI is more efficient.
> > +
> > + tiadc_writel(adc_dev, REG_IRQSTATUS, IRQENB_FIFO1THRES |
> > + IRQENB_FIFO1OVRRUN | IRQENB_FIFO1UNDRFLW);
> > + tiadc_writel(adc_dev, REG_IRQENABLE, IRQENB_FIFO1THRES
> > + | IRQENB_FIFO1OVRRUN);
> > +
> > + iio_trigger_notify_done(indio_dev->trig);
> Are you actually done? What happens if another trigger turns up in the
> meantime? I'd expect this to occur only after the results of the trigger
> have been handled.
Indeed Done is passed immediately while ADC is still sampling.
Because of the way the trigger was used and structure of the driver.
> > +static int tiadc_buffer_preenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > +{
> Don't have pointless wrappers like this.
Noted
> > + return iio_sw_buffer_preenable(indio_dev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void tiadc_adc_work(struct work_struct *work_s)
> > +{
> > + struct tiadc_device *adc_dev =
> > + container_of(work_s, struct tiadc_device, poll_work);
> > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = iio_priv_to_dev(adc_dev);
> > + struct iio_buffer *buffer = indio_dev->buffer;
> > + int i, j, k, fifo1count, read;
> > + unsigned int config;
> So normally we'd just fill with one sample hence for this case
> I'd expect to push out whatever samples are in the fifo right now
> then return. The next trigger would grab the next lot etc.
>
Again. If I understand correctly,
I restructure the driver so that
enabling the buffer via userspace starts sampling the ADC channels.
Preenable/postenable do all that hard work.
I need to use iio_trigger_register to create an IIO trigger inside the
driver.
The IRQ handler for FIFO Threshold causes a trigger event.
The trigger handler pushes the entire fifo to userspace.
I'd like a small ACK before I get to work.
Just to make sure I got things correctly.
Thanks for the input
Zubair
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
