On 20 November 2012 14:17, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > No, not really, it just does not work well with devm_* patches that got > applied: on removal you unprepare clock as the very first operation and > then devm_* does the rest which is wrong order. Nice. I don't expect the order would do anything wrong, as we aren't touching any registers between unpreparing clock and devm_ undo stuff. > I am looking at adding dem_* for clocks. You mean, adding devm_clk_prepare, devm_clk_enable, devm_clk_prepare_enable ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
