On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:58:06 -0800 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I do not think that using ONESHOT IRQ handlers in shared interrupt > configuration is a good idea as that interrupt will stay masked until > the keypad is done processing it, which may take some time. I don't really see what the problem is, shared ONESHOT handlers are supported by the IRQ framework. The IRQ line of this device is an open drain and so can be shared, and is shared on the hardware I'm using! I agree that the interrupt masking time might rise a little if many devices share the same line, but that's the normal drawback of shared interrupts. Alban -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
