On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 05:34:30PM +0100, Alban Bedel wrote: > On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:58:06 -0800 > Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I do not think that using ONESHOT IRQ handlers in shared interrupt > > configuration is a good idea as that interrupt will stay masked until > > the keypad is done processing it, which may take some time. > > I don't really see what the problem is, shared ONESHOT handlers are > supported by the IRQ framework. The IRQ line of this device is an open > drain and so can be shared, and is shared on the hardware I'm using! > > I agree that the interrupt masking time might rise a little if many > devices share the same line, but that's the normal drawback of shared > interrupts. OK, fair enough. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
