On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Saturday 30 January 2010, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 07:41:20AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > The change looks good, but the same driver also uses the BKL in the >> > default_llseek function. It would be nice to get rid of that in the >> > same patch, e.g. by adding a ".llseek = generic_file_llseek," line >> > in the file_operations, or making it call nonseekable_open() if the >> > driver does not require seek to do anything. >> > >> >> I am afraid you mixed up the drivers, I don't see uinput implementing >> seek... > > Sorry, I should have been clearer, but not implementing llseek > is the problem I was referring to: When a driver has no explicit > .llseek operation in its file operations and does not call > nonseekable_open from its open operation, the VFS layer will > implicitly use default_llseek, which takes the BKL. We're > in the process of changing drivers not to do this, one by one > so we can kill the BKL in the end. > I know we've discussed this before, but why wouldn't the following make more sense? .llseek = no_llseek, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html