On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 20:28:19, Miguel Aguilar wrote: > Sekhar, > > Nori, Sekhar wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 09:16:27, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:37:35AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >>> Miguel Aguilar <miguel.aguilar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> > >>>> Sekhar, > >>>> > >>>> If you and Sneha agree I will write driver in terms of davinci instead of dm365. > >>>> > >>> I add a vote the davinci* naming instead of dm365*. > >>> > >> Can you guarantee that this will be the only keypad implementation for > >> davinci? > > > > No. That cannot be guaranteed. Surely there will be attempt to reuse > > this before inventing new. A new implementation will be a probably be > > a new driver (named after what the new implementation is called). > > > > So, I guess it is better to call this driver "davinci-keyscan" after > > [MA] Do you think that it is better naming this driver as Key Scan instead of > Keypad? Yes. Thanks, Sekhar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
