Sekhar,
Nori, Sekhar wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 09:16:27, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:37:35AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Miguel Aguilar <miguel.aguilar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Sekhar,
If you and Sneha agree I will write driver in terms of davinci instead of dm365.
I add a vote the davinci* naming instead of dm365*.
Can you guarantee that this will be the only keypad implementation for
davinci?
No. That cannot be guaranteed. Surely there will be attempt to reuse
this before inventing new. A new implementation will be a probably be
a new driver (named after what the new implementation is called).
So, I guess it is better to call this driver "davinci-keyscan" after
[MA] Do you think that it is better naming this driver as Key Scan instead of
Keypad?
what the IP has been called (http://focus.ti.com/lit/ug/sprufi8/sprufi8.pdf).
If not then I'd say using base model number and updating
Kconfig text is fine.
But hope the other way is okay too. Miguel has already submitted a new
patch using davinci naming.
Thanks,
Sekhar
Thanks,
Miguel Aguilar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
