On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 09:16:27, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:37:35AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > > Miguel Aguilar <miguel.aguilar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > Sekhar, > > > > > > If you and Sneha agree I will write driver in terms of davinci instead of dm365. > > > > > > > I add a vote the davinci* naming instead of dm365*. > > > > Can you guarantee that this will be the only keypad implementation for > davinci? No. That cannot be guaranteed. Surely there will be attempt to reuse this before inventing new. A new implementation will be a probably be a new driver (named after what the new implementation is called). So, I guess it is better to call this driver "davinci-keyscan" after what the IP has been called (http://focus.ti.com/lit/ug/sprufi8/sprufi8.pdf). > If not then I'd say using base model number and updating > Kconfig text is fine. But hope the other way is okay too. Miguel has already submitted a new patch using davinci naming. Thanks, Sekhar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
