On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 08:53:19AM +0100, Hennerich, Michael wrote: > > >From: Jiri Kosina > >Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 9:33 AM > > > >On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > >> > + if (event & KP_INT) { > >> > + adp5520_read(dev->master, KP_INT_STAT_1, ®_val_low); > >> > + adp5520_read(dev->master, KP_INT_STAT_2, ®_val_high); > >> > + > >> > + keymask = (reg_val_high << 8) | reg_val_low; > >> > + /* Read twice to clear */ > >> > + adp5520_read(dev->master, KP_INT_STAT_1, ®_val_low); > >> > + adp5520_read(dev->master, KP_INT_STAT_2, ®_val_high); > >> > + keymask |= (reg_val_high << 8) | reg_val_low; > >> > + adp5520_keys_report_event(dev, keymask, 1); > >> > + } > >> > + > >> > + if (event & KR_INT) { > >> > >> Why do you check the same condition twice? > > > >It actually doesn't seem to be the same condition (KP_INT vs. KR_INT), but > >it's difficult to say, as these constants are apparently added in some > >other patch I have no idea about. > > KP Key-Press versus Key-Release > Yeah, my bad... However the constants could be made more distinct. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html