Em Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:00:54 -0400 Jarod Wilson <jarod@xxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > On Thursday 27 August 2009 18:06:51 Devin Heitmueller wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Mauro Carvalho > > Chehab<mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Em Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:36:36 +0300 > > > Ville Syrjälä <syrjala@xxxxxx> escreveu: > > > > > > > > >> I welcome this effort. It would be nice to have some kind of consistent > > >> behaviour between devices. But just limiting the effort to IR devices > > >> doesn't make sense. It shouldn't matter how the device is connected. > > > > > > Agreed. > > > > > >> > > >> FASTWORWARD,REWIND,FORWARD and BACK aren't very clear. To me it would > > >> make most sense if FASTFORWARD and REWIND were paired and FORWARD and > > >> BACK were paired. I actually have those two a bit confused in > > >> ati_remote2 too where I used FASTFORWARD and BACK. I suppose it should > > >> be REWIND instead. > > > > > > Makes sense. I updated it at the wiki. I also tried to group the keycodes by > > > function there. > > > > > >> Also I should probably use ZOOM for the maximize/restore button (it's > > >> FRONT now), and maybe SETUP instead of ENTER for another. It has a > > >> picture of a checkbox, Windows software apparently shows a setup menu > > >> when it's pressed. > > >> > > >> There are also a couple of buttons where no keycode really seems to > > >> match. One is the mouse button drag. I suppose I could implement the > > >> drag lock feature in the driver but I'm not sure if that's a good idea. > > >> It would make that button special and unmappable. Currently I have that > > >> mapped to EDIT IIRC. > > > > > > I'm not sure what we should do with those buttons. > > > > > > Probably, the most complete IR spec is the RC5 codes: > > > http://c6000.spectrumdigital.com/davincievm/revf/files/msp430/rc5_codes.pdf > > > (not sure if this table is complete or accurate, but on a search I did > > > today, this is the one that gave me a better documentation) > > > > > > I suspect that, after solving the most used cases, we'll need to take a better look on it, > > > identifying the missing cases of the real implementations and add them to input.h. > > > > > >> The other oddball button has a picture of a stopwatch (I think, it's > > >> not very clear). Currently it uses COFFEE, but maybe TIMER or something > > >> like that should be added. The Windows software's manual just say it > > >> toggles TV-on-demand, but I have no idea what that actually is. > > > > > > Hmm... Maybe TV-on-demand is another name for pay-per-view? > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Mauro > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in > > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > > > > > Since we're on the topic of IR support, there are probably a couple of > > other things we may want to be thinking about if we plan on > > refactoring the API at all: > > > > 1. The fact that for RC5 remote controls, the tables in ir-keymaps.c > > only have the second byte. In theory, they should have both bytes > > since the vendor byte helps prevents receiving spurious commands from > > unrelated remote controls. We should include the ability to "ignore > > the vendor byte" so we can continue to support all the remotes > > currently in the ir-keymaps.c where we don't know what the vendor byte > > should contain. > > > > 2.. The fact that the current API provides no real way to change the > > mode of operation for the IR receiver, for those receivers that > > support multiple modes (NEC/RC5/RC6). While you have the ability to > > change the mapping table from userland via the keytable program, there > > is currently no way to tell the IR receiver which mode to operate in. > > > > One would argue that the above keymaps structure should include new > > fields to indicate what type of remote it is (NEC/RC5/RC6 etc), as > > well as field to indicate that the vendor codes are absent from the > > key mapping for that remote). Given this, I can change the dib0700 > > and em28xx IR receivers to automatically set the IR capture mode > > appropriate based on which remote is in the device profile. > > Jon Smirl actually wrote some fully functional proof-of-concept IR > handling code about a year ago, that included auto-detection and auto > decoding of several protocols. Perhaps some of that is relevant and > reusable here? (I still have a copy of the tree here somewhere...) Yes, it seems interesting. We may try to merge his code at ir-functions. > I've been toying with the notion of extending the input device support > that was added to the lirc_imon driver a bit ago, and add a full key > map that delivers events (we already do this for mouse functionality), > but include the ability to also use the remote and/or receiver in a > raw IR mode with lircd. Wouldn't be terribly difficult I think to do > something similar for the standard MCE remotes and receivers... Just > a simple matter of some time and some code. Unfortunately, I'm a bit > short on the time part right now... Interesting. This could work fine with the IR's that are directly connected to a GPIO pin at the MCE receivers. Cheers, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
