On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 14:47 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > > > [ thanks for the analysis Johannes ... involving also Oliver here; really > > > > > seems like a false positive to me ] > > > > I think he's right. But as a matter of principle I'd like to see > > > > flush_scheduled_work() avoided where possible, hence the patch. > > > I am not entirely sure that this is the same issue as the one from #13136 > > > of kernel.org bugzilla. > > > Anyway, for reference, the patch Oliver mentioned here is below. > > Thanks. Unfortunately I have another problem that turns off lockdep so I > > can't test this right now, sorry. > > Are you able to reproduce the problem with current git (the expected fix > is 89092ddd7a). I don't know, unfortunately, because I keep getting a different lockdep report at _suspend_ time. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
