Quoting "Oliver Neukum" <oliver@xxxxxxxxxx>:
Am Freitag, 8. Mai 2009 09:46:36 schrieb Jussi Kivilinna:+static int sj_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, const struct hid_device_id *id) +{ + int ret; + + ret = hid_parse(hdev); + if (ret) { + dev_err(&hdev->dev, "parse failed\n"); + goto err; + } + + ret = hid_hw_start(hdev, HID_CONNECT_DEFAULT & ~HID_CONNECT_FF); + if (ret) { + dev_err(&hdev->dev, "hw start failed\n"); + goto err; + } + + sjoyff_init(hdev);Do you really want to ignore errors this returns? Regards Oliver
It's done same in hid-pl.c & hid-gaff.c which I used base for this driver. I'd say yes, ignoring return sjoyff_init is ok. If ff-setup fails adapter will still be usable (but without ff). This is actually what happened when I tried this driver with other Wisegroup adapter.
-Jussi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
