Hi,
due to a bug in another tool it came out that
systemd/dracut cannot mount /sysroot if the same rootflags=
parameter is passed twice:
rootflags=subvol=@ rootflags=subvol=@
Yep, this should be fixed somewhere else, but I still
like to make the /sysroot mount more robust or at least find
out what what is going on more detailed.
journalctl -b -u sysroot.mount
Jan 20 15:02:30 localhost systemd[1]: Failed to mount /sysroot.
Jan 20 15:02:30 localhost systemd[1]: Unit sysroot.mount entered failed state.
Jan 20 15:16:46 localhost systemd[1]: Mounting /sysroot...
Jan 20 15:16:46 localhost mount[970]: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/vda2,
Jan 20 15:16:46 localhost systemd[1]: sysroot.mount mount process exited, code=exited status=32
It looks like in
modules.d/99base/parse-root-opts.sh
rflags is made to "subvol=@,subvol=@"
and
modules.d/95rootfs-block/mount-root.sh
fails due to passing this as -o to mount?
But what I am mostly missing is any dracut warning.
I should see:
modules.d/95rootfs-block/mount-root.sh:
while ! mount -t ${rootfs} -o "$_rflags_ro" "${root#block:}" "$NEWROOT"; do
warn "Failed to mount -t ${rootfs} -o $_rflags_ro ${root#block:} $NEWROOT"
fsck_ask_err
done
?
This would give an obvios hint what is going wrong.
But I cannot find where "warn" is even defined.
Could be that I came on the wrong track somewhere.
I guess there cannot be made much against passing bad (or doubled) rootflags=
options, things will simply fail then, right?
Still it would be nice if someone can give me a hint how I can
debug similar stuff easier next time.
Thanks!
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
