On 01/15/14 at 03:16pm, Vivek Goyal wrote: > Bao, > > This is harald's call but personally to me this testonly options look > little odd. Yeah, it does look odd. But I don't want this to affect the existed test cases. > > I am looking at old discussion here. > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.initramfs/3370 > > So harald's suggestion of using systemd looks fine. It is just a matter of > figuring out who should load watchdog modules in initramfs. > > I personally feel it should be watchdog module but if harald does not > like it, we can atleast for the time being keep that logic in kdump > module. But trying to create this testonly mode feels odd to me. Yeah, agree. For the time being, only iTCO_wdt need load module and satisfacory. However, there are many kinds of watchdog with different implementation. Finally, a independent dracut module may be needed, it can be put into dracut as a independent folder, e.g 06wdt which is different then 04watchdog. > > Harald, can you please let us know your preference on this. Modify > 04watchdog module to include relevant drivers in hostonly mode or > push this logic into kdump module for now. > > Thanks > Vivek > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 08:53:48PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
