On 07/31/2013 04:29 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:25:57PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: > > [..] >>>> I like it. >>>> >>>> Vivek: would that solve one of your systemd problems? >>> >>> Hi Harald, >>> >>> Yes this should solve one of the problems of being able to call emergency >>> shell from kdump module. >>> >>> I was thinking of modirying emergency.service on the fly and then reload >>> systemd config. But I guess this solution is simpler. >>> >>> It also takes away the flexibility of being able to specify "reboot" or >>> some other actions as failure actions. But nobody as asked for those >>> yet. >>> >>> So yes, agreed, this will solve atleast one problem. So makes sense >>> to take it in. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Vivek >>> >> >> pushed, thanks! > > Hi Harald, > > Do you still like the parameter name "rd.action_on_fail". I think a new > parameter say, "rd.no_emergecny_shell" might make more sense to reflect > what we are doing. > > If you like it, I can request bao to post a new patch and make appropriate > changes. > > Thanks > Vivek > You can add the rd.no_emergency_shell parser in your kdump module and touch the marker file. I think that gives you more flexibility for runtime decisions. You can just add and remove that file on will. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
