On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:25:57PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: [..] > >> I like it. > >> > >> Vivek: would that solve one of your systemd problems? > > > > Hi Harald, > > > > Yes this should solve one of the problems of being able to call emergency > > shell from kdump module. > > > > I was thinking of modirying emergency.service on the fly and then reload > > systemd config. But I guess this solution is simpler. > > > > It also takes away the flexibility of being able to specify "reboot" or > > some other actions as failure actions. But nobody as asked for those > > yet. > > > > So yes, agreed, this will solve atleast one problem. So makes sense > > to take it in. > > > > Thanks > > Vivek > > > > pushed, thanks! Hi Harald, Do you still like the parameter name "rd.action_on_fail". I think a new parameter say, "rd.no_emergecny_shell" might make more sense to reflect what we are doing. If you like it, I can request bao to post a new patch and make appropriate changes. Thanks Vivek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
