On 13.01.2012 18:07, Cong Wang wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 at 11:48 GMT, Amadeusz Żołnowski <aidecoe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> For example for line in /etc/fstab: >> >> /dev/vg/usr /usr ext4 nosuid,nodev 0 2 >> >> fsck_single is called as follows: >> >> fsck_single /dev/vg/usr ext4 nosuid,nodev >> >> and this eventually resolves to: >> >> e2fsck -a nosuid,nodev /dev/vg/usr >> >> which causes e2fsck usage error. >> --- >> modules.d/98usrmount/mount-usr.sh | 4 ++-- >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/modules.d/98usrmount/mount-usr.sh b/modules.d/98usrmount/mount-usr.sh >> index a61f935..fc205d5 100755 >> --- a/modules.d/98usrmount/mount-usr.sh >> +++ b/modules.d/98usrmount/mount-usr.sh >> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ mount_usr() >> >> if [ "x$_usr_found" != "x" ]; then >> # we have to mount /usr >> - fsck_single "$_dev" "$_fs" "$_opts" >> + fsck_single "$_dev" "$_fs" > > Yes, this change makes sense. > >> _ret=$? >> echo $_ret >/run/initramfs/usr-fsck >> if [ $_ret -ne 255 ]; then >> @@ -29,4 +29,4 @@ mount_usr() >> fi >> } >> >> -mount_usr >> \ No newline at end of file >> +mount_usr > > But what is this one?? That just adds a newline at the end of the file, IIRC -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
