On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 at 11:48 GMT, Amadeusz Żołnowski <aidecoe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For example for line in /etc/fstab: > > /dev/vg/usr /usr ext4 nosuid,nodev 0 2 > > fsck_single is called as follows: > > fsck_single /dev/vg/usr ext4 nosuid,nodev > > and this eventually resolves to: > > e2fsck -a nosuid,nodev /dev/vg/usr > > which causes e2fsck usage error. > --- > modules.d/98usrmount/mount-usr.sh | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/modules.d/98usrmount/mount-usr.sh b/modules.d/98usrmount/mount-usr.sh > index a61f935..fc205d5 100755 > --- a/modules.d/98usrmount/mount-usr.sh > +++ b/modules.d/98usrmount/mount-usr.sh > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ mount_usr() > > if [ "x$_usr_found" != "x" ]; then > # we have to mount /usr > - fsck_single "$_dev" "$_fs" "$_opts" > + fsck_single "$_dev" "$_fs" Yes, this change makes sense. > _ret=$? > echo $_ret >/run/initramfs/usr-fsck > if [ $_ret -ne 255 ]; then > @@ -29,4 +29,4 @@ mount_usr() > fi > } > > -mount_usr > \ No newline at end of file > +mount_usr But what is this one?? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
