On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 11:14 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:06:33AM +0000, Adam Spragg wrote: > > > But one of the goals of dracut seems to be to become part of the kernel > > source tree. > > I'm beginning to have some second thoughts about the feasibility of this. > There are a number of use-cases where regeneration of the initramfs > is desirable, which would mean a standalone tool would be needed that > isn't shipped as part of the kernel package. True, but that does not mean it would not be useful to have a reference initrd generation tool. How about a round of testing, documentation, and bugfixing to hammer out any weirdness in the current codebase, then call it 0.5 "may eat babies" and try to get feedback from a wider audience? Do we have a bugtracker set up for dracut yet? > Dave > -- Victor Lowther RHCE# 805008539634727 LPIC-2# LPI000140019 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
