On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 21:14, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:09:16PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>
> > We are using the same rules as in the real root since we use udev in
> > initramfs. Only one initramfs specific rule is created on-the-fly by
> > the initramfs itself, based on the vales from the boot command line.
> >
> > I'm not against adding such a directory, but what kind of rules do you
> > think would go there? I'm at the moment not sure, that they would need
> > to be different.
>
> The LVM case for example, to auto-assemble volume groups.
>
> What we have now is..
>
> SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="lvm_end"
> ACTION!="add|change", GOTO="lvm_end"
>
> KERNEL!="sr*", IMPORT{program}="vol_id --export $tempnode"
> ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="LVM2_member", RUN+="/sbin/lvm vgscan", RUN+="/sbin/lvm vgchange -ay"
>
> LABEL="lvm_end"
>
> which isn't great..
>
>
> dmraid is another case.
Yeah, but don't we want auto-assembly in the real rootfs too? Which
would be the same rules again in both cases.
Besides that we really want the dm guys to fix their stuff, to work
properly on modern systems, after all these years. :)
Cheers,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
