On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 10:47:29 +0100
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello Jonathan,
>
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2024 at 12:44:27PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > Given the mix of fixes and other material (kind of fixes, but also kind
> > of new functionality), I've queued this for the next merge window in my
> > togreg branch. If you think there are particular patches that need to
> > go sooner then I can handle them in a split fashion, but that does add
> > risk that the whole lot might no land depending on timings (particularly
> > given it's coming into vacation season).
>
> So you tend to not backport the rdy-gpios patches (i.e.
>
> dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,ad7{124,173,192,780}: Allow specifications of a gpio for irq line
> iio: adc: ad_sigma_delta: Add support for reading irq status using a GPIO
>
> )? I personally would want to have these backported, too, but I can
> understand that you might decide that in a different way.
Yeah. If it were tiny amount of code I might have gone the other way, but
this just got a bit too complex.
>
> Cherry picking
>
> iio: adc: ad_sigma_delta: Fix a race condition
> iio: adc: ad_sigma_delta: Check for previous ready signals
>
> isn't trivial without the rdy-gpios, but they could be reworked. Tell me
> if you want a helping hand (or an eye judging your backport).
>
A backport won't go anywhere until these are upstream. At that point if you
want them, feel free to suggest backporting these and provide the code ;)
Thanks,
Jonathan
> Best regards
> Uwe
