Hello Jonathan,
On Sun, Dec 08, 2024 at 12:44:27PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Given the mix of fixes and other material (kind of fixes, but also kind
> of new functionality), I've queued this for the next merge window in my
> togreg branch. If you think there are particular patches that need to
> go sooner then I can handle them in a split fashion, but that does add
> risk that the whole lot might no land depending on timings (particularly
> given it's coming into vacation season).
So you tend to not backport the rdy-gpios patches (i.e.
dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,ad7{124,173,192,780}: Allow specifications of a gpio for irq line
iio: adc: ad_sigma_delta: Add support for reading irq status using a GPIO
)? I personally would want to have these backported, too, but I can
understand that you might decide that in a different way.
Cherry picking
iio: adc: ad_sigma_delta: Fix a race condition
iio: adc: ad_sigma_delta: Check for previous ready signals
isn't trivial without the rdy-gpios, but they could be reworked. Tell me
if you want a helping hand (or an eye judging your backport).
Best regards
Uwe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
