Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] iio: light: Add support for TI OPT4060 color sensor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 16:35:18 +0100
Per-Daniel Olsson <perdaniel.olsson@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 11/9/24 16:09, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 13:00:36 +0100
> > Per-Daniel Olsson <perdaniel.olsson@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >   
> >> Add support for Texas Instruments OPT4060 RGBW Color sensor.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Per-Daniel Olsson <perdaniel.olsson@xxxxxxxx>  
> > Hi Per-Daniel
> > 
> > Main comment in here is that the ABI is standard (though oddly
> > missing in some cases from the main ABI doc). Annoyingly the
> > docs build process (try make htmldocs) does not work if there
> > are multiple entries for the same ABI, so we need to ensure that
> > the documentation for common ABI is in just one place.
> > That makes device specific ABI docs tricky, so instead we tend
> > to use extra rst files in Documentation/iio/ to provide more details.
> > 
> > Jonathan
> >   
> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> Thank you for your code comments, I will fix those in the next version.
> I have been trying to understand what I should do in
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio but I don't really get it. See
> my questions below.
> 
> / P-D
> 
> >   
> >> ---
> >>  .../ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-light-opt4060   |   66 +
> >>  drivers/iio/light/Kconfig                     |   13 +
> >>  drivers/iio/light/Makefile                    |    1 +
> >>  drivers/iio/light/opt4060.c                   | 1282 +++++++++++++++++
> >>  4 files changed, 1362 insertions(+)
> >>  create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-light-opt4060
> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/iio/light/opt4060.c
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-light-opt4060 b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-light-opt4060
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..187e750602ee
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-light-opt4060
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
> >> +What:		/sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_intensity_red_raw  
> > 
> > Huh... This is general ABI but not present in the sysfs-bus-iio
> > where it should be.  There are some control parameters on these channels
> > but not the actual channels.
> > 
> > Please add them there instead of in a device specific file.
> > Also group the 3 colors together as done for intensity_x, _y, _z
> >  
> 
> So you want me to add 4 lines for in_intensity_X_raw where X is red, green,
> blue and clear? Should I add those together with a description in the end of
> the file or some place where I find similar definitions? The closest I can
> find is in_intensityY_raw (line 1629 in the version of the file I'm looking at).
> I also can't find the entries for in_intensity_red/green/blue_scale? I can find
> in_intensity_x/y/z_scale but those were added in a commit for the as73211 driver
> and as far as I can understand from the driver, x, y and z are coordinates and

xyz are color spaces coordinates for CIE XYZ color space. Which admittedly gets
confusing when we use XYZ for index numbers in this file.

> not some kind of unknown variables in that context. I'm sorry for what I assume
> are really stupid questions, but I just don't get it...
No problem.  There are often no 'right' rules for this, just better and worse
options!
> 
> Basically I think I need to add the following 7 lines to the file:
> 
> What:    /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_intensity_red_raw
> What:    /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_intensity_green_raw
> What:    /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_intensity_blue_raw
> What:    /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_intensity_clear_raw
> What:    /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_intensity_red_scale
> What:    /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_intensity_green_scale
> What:    /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_intensity_blue_scale
> 
> Is that correct? Should the _raw ones be added in the groups starting on line 1629?
yes.
> Should the _scale ones be added to the group starting on line 469?
yes.
> 
> >> +KernelVersion:
> >> +Contact:	linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> +Description:
> >> +		Unit-less raw value for red intensity.
> >> +
> >> +What:		/sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_intensity_red_scale
> >> +KernelVersion:
> >> +Contact:	linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> +Description:
> >> +		Decimal value for the red component of the light. The value
> >> +		is normalized to give the relative red component
> >> +		independently of the light intensity.  
> > 
> > I'm not sure I understand this text.   Also why Decimal?
> > Maybe something like:
> > 
> > "Scales the raw value so that for a particular test light source, typically
> > white, the measurement intensity is the same across different colour channels."
> >   
> 
> Your text is also not totally correct, but probably better. The parameters are
> first scaled the way you describe but then divided by the sum of the 3 RGB channels.
> This to give an estimate of the color ratio between the three color components
> independently of the light intensity. A decimal value between 1.0 and 0 will be
> returned. Is this the type of oddity that should be documented in an rst file, the
> way you described further down?
Hmm. A divide by the sum is unfortunate.  The only common case for this is
quarternions (where the 4 elements are normalized).

I suggest you don't divide through, just leave that for userspace to do
if it wishes.  Fine to document that procedure in an rst file though if you like.

> 
> >>  The raw value for red
> >> +		is multiplied by 2.4 before being normalized, this to adapt
> >> +		to the relative sensitivity of the red filter of the sensor.
> >> +		The factor for green is 1.0 and the factor for blue is 1.3.  
> > An unfortunately characteristic of the ABI docs is we can't have duplication so
> > once this is moved to the general docs this detail will have to go in favour
> > of generality.  You could add a little 'footnote' to the entry to say that
> > for this particular device the meaning is this.
> > 
> >   
> >> +
> >> +What:		/sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_intensity_green_raw
> >> +KernelVersion:
> >> +Contact:	linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> +Description:
> >> +		Unit-less raw value for green intensity.
> >> +
> >> +What:		/sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_intensity_green_scale
> >> +KernelVersion:
> >> +Contact:	linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> +Description:
> >> +		Decimal value for the green component of the light. The
> >> +		value is normalized to give the relative green component
> >> +		independently of the light intensity. The raw value for
> >> +		green is multiplied by 1.0 before being normalized, this to
> >> +		adapt to the relative sensitivity of the green filter of
> >> +		the sensor. The factor for red is 2.4 and the factor for
> >> +		blue is 1.3.
> >> +
> >> +What:		/sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_intensity_blue_raw
> >> +KernelVersion:
> >> +Contact:	linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> +Description:
> >> +		Unit-less raw value for blue intensity.
> >> +
> >> +What:		/sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_intensity_blue_scale
> >> +KernelVersion:
> >> +Contact:	linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> +Description:
> >> +		Decimal value for the blue component of the light. The
> >> +		value is normalized to give the relative blue component
> >> +		independently of the light intensity. The raw value for
> >> +		blue is multiplied by 1.3 before being normalized, this to
> >> +		adapt to the relative sensitivity of the blue filter of the
> >> +		sensor. The factor for red is 2.4 and the factor for green
> >> +		is 1.0.
> >> +
> >> +What:		/sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_intensity_clear_raw
> >> +KernelVersion:
> >> +Contact:	linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> +Description:
> >> +		Unit-less raw value for clear intensity.
> >> +
> >> +What:		/sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_illuminance_input  
> > This is already in the main ABI doc.   
> >> +KernelVersion:
> >> +Contact:	linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> +Description:
> >> +		Lux value for the light illuminance. The value is
> >> +		calculated using the wide spectrum green channel and
> >> +		multiplied by 2.15e-3.  
> > It may be worth capturing these details in an rst file under 
> > Documentation/iio/  Just remember to add an entry in the index.rst file
> > there so that they get included in the docs buidl.
> >  
> 
> Ok, I can describe this in an rst file.

Great,

Sorry for slow reply. Things got a bit busy for a week or so!

Jonathan

>  
> ...





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux