On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 15:16:00 +0200 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dan reported that ddata might be used uninitialised in some cases. > Let's initialise it to NULL (patches 1 - 3). With that, update one driver > to drop an unneeded anymore check (included in patch 3). > > While at it, one more cleanup to kxcjk-1013 (patch 4) is added. > > Jonathan, dunno if you want to rebase at this stage (probably not), > but if you do, feel free to fold the patches 1-3 to the initial code. Ah. I've just picked v2, but given I squashed anyway the commit message changes don't matter. I was curious what Assing meant but not need to ask given I wasn't going to keep it. Jonathan > > In v3: > - made Subject more specific for patches 1-3 (Markus) > > In v2: > - rewritten patches 1-3 to do the job on the caller side (Jonathan) > > Andy Shevchenko (4): > iio: light: isl29018: Assign NULL to ddata in isl29018_probe() > iio: light: ltr501: Assign NULL to ddata in ltr501_probe() > iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Assign NULL to ddata in kxcjk1013_probe() > iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Deduplicate ODR startup time array > > drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c | 30 ++++++------------------------ > drivers/iio/light/isl29018.c | 2 +- > drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) >
