On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 7:04 PM Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <Jean-Baptiste.Maneyrol@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello, > > it would be true if there was a return statement before the 2 labels, and that the 2 lables were only error handling case. > > But this is not the case, since end_session label is the end of the normal end of the function, not error handling. This is very old code and not very clear, I'm sorry about that. > > But the modifications are breaking the code and interrupt handling will not work correctly anymore, since inv_reset_fifo() will be called now every time the function is called. > > Best regards, > JB I apologize for the confusion, I just realized the logic is incorrect as well. I didn't test it because I thought it trivial, I will send patch after verification.
