Hi,
On 6/11/24 1:51 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 11/06/2024 00:13, Judith Mendez wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
On 6/10/24 9:58 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 10/06/2024 16:46, Judith Mendez wrote:
Add new compatible ti,am62-eqep for TI K3 devices. If a device
uses this compatible, require power-domains property.
Since there is only one functional and interface clock for eqep,
clock-names is not really required, so removed from required
section, make it optional for ti,am3352-eqep compatible, and
update the example.
...
interrupts = <79>;
};
+ - |
+ #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
+ #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
+ #include <dt-bindings/soc/ti,sci_pm_domain.h>
+
+ bus {
+ #address-cells = <2>;
+ #size-cells = <2>;
+ eqep1: counter@23210000 {
No need for label
+ compatible = "ti,am62-eqep";
+ reg = <0x00 0x23210000 0x00 0x100>;
+ power-domains = <&k3_pds 60 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
+ clocks = <&k3_clks 60 0>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 117 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ status = "disabled";
Drop... which also points to another comment - since this was no-op and
example is basically the same, then just don't add it. No point.
Ok, then I will drop the new example, thanks.
BTW..
In the existing example for ti,am3352-eqep compatible,
do you know if it is appropriate to drop clock-names
from the example if it is no longer required?
It does not really matter.
Understood, thanks.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
