On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 16:57:47 +0000
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Feb 2024 10:08:38 +0100
> Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 05:36 +0200, Cosmin Tanislav wrote:
> > > As specified in the datasheet, the I2C FIFO data register is
> > > 0x18, not 0x42. 0x42 was used by mistake when adapting the
> > > ADXL372 driver.
> For future reference (not worth a v2): You could wrap a little longer - 75
> chars is fine normally for commit messages.
> > >
> > > Fix this mistake.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> >
> > This needs a Fixes: tag. With that:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Fine to just reply to each of these emails with an appropriate
> fixes tag - no need for a v2.
>
Given these were still in my queue waiting for a fixes tag,
I went looking.
Fixes: cbab791c5e2a ("iio: accel: add ADXL367 driver")
Both patches added and both applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git
Thanks
Jonathan
>
> >
> > > drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_i2c.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_i2c.c b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_i2c.c
> > > index b595fe94f3a3..62c74bdc0d77 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_i2c.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_i2c.c
> > > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
> > >
> > > #include "adxl367.h"
> > >
> > > -#define ADXL367_I2C_FIFO_DATA 0x42
> > > +#define ADXL367_I2C_FIFO_DATA 0x18
> > >
> > > struct adxl367_i2c_state {
> > > struct regmap *regmap;
> >
>
>
