On Wed, 07 Feb 2024 10:08:38 +0100
Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 05:36 +0200, Cosmin Tanislav wrote:
> > As specified in the datasheet, the I2C FIFO data register is
> > 0x18, not 0x42. 0x42 was used by mistake when adapting the
> > ADXL372 driver.
For future reference (not worth a v2): You could wrap a little longer - 75
chars is fine normally for commit messages.
> >
> > Fix this mistake.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> This needs a Fixes: tag. With that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fine to just reply to each of these emails with an appropriate
fixes tag - no need for a v2.
>
> > drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_i2c.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_i2c.c b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_i2c.c
> > index b595fe94f3a3..62c74bdc0d77 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_i2c.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_i2c.c
> > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
> >
> > #include "adxl367.h"
> >
> > -#define ADXL367_I2C_FIFO_DATA 0x42
> > +#define ADXL367_I2C_FIFO_DATA 0x18
> >
> > struct adxl367_i2c_state {
> > struct regmap *regmap;
>
