On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 13:49:22 +0200 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 04:42:34PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Sorry for the rapid resend, Andy noticed I'd messed up creating the v3 patch > > set with some updates committed in the wrong patch. > > > > Since v3: The updates to alignment of device_for_each_child_node_scopd() were > > in the wrong patch. Move them to patch 4 where they should always > > have been. (thanks Andy!) > > > > Since v2: Thanks to Sakari and Andy for reviews. > > - New first patch moving fwnode_handle_put() into property.h > > - Tweak alignment in the loop macro > > - Pick up tags. > > - scopd -> scoped typo fix in some patch descriptions. > > > > As can be seen by the examples from IIO that follow this can save > > a reasonable amount of complexity and boiler plate code, often enabling > > additional cleanups in related code such as use of > > return dev_err_probe(). > > > > Given we are now fairly late in the cycle, I'd expect to take this > > through the IIO tree and we can make use of it elsewhere next cycle. > > > > Note I don't have the hardware so this is compile tested only. > > Hence I'd appreciate some Tested-by tags if anyone can poke one of the > > effected drivers. > > > > Julia Lawal has posted some nice coccinelle magic for the DT equivalents. > > Referenced from that cover letter. Similar may help us convert more > > drivers to use this new approach, but often hand tweaking can take > > additional advantage of other cleanup.h based magic, or things like > > return dev_err_probe(). > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240211174237.182947-1-jic23@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > It seems you are got all necessary tags to go. Light on the driver changes to use it, but seems that we have reached convergence on the infrastructure. I'll let it sit until the end of the week though as I want to get a pull request out anyway before taking this into my tree. > I commented with some side notes that may be addressed later on. > Up to you. Thanks. I'll catch up with those shortly. Jonathan >
