> On 29/01/2024 14:30, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > >> On 28/01/2024 12:25, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > >>> Add device bindings for asm330lhhxg1 IMU sensor. > >>> Use asm330lhhx as fallback device for asm330lhhxg1 since it implements > >>> all the features currently supported by asm330lhhxg1. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> --- > >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/st,lsm6dsx.yaml | 3 +++ > >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/st,lsm6dsx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/st,lsm6dsx.yaml > >>> index 28b667a9cb76..7ba3de66a2e1 100644 > >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/st,lsm6dsx.yaml > >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/st,lsm6dsx.yaml > >>> @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ properties: > >>> - items: > >>> - const: st,asm330lhb > >>> - const: st,asm330lhh > >>> + - items: > >>> + - const: st,asm330lhhxg1 > >>> + - const: st,asm330lhhx > >> > >> lhhx is compatible with st,lsm6dsr, so some explanation would be useful > >> why it is not included here. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Krzysztof > >> > > > > Do you mean something like: > > > > I meant either explanation in commit msg or adding lsm6dsr fallback. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > I think we can use lsm6dsr as fallback instead of asm330lhhx (for st_lsm6dsx there is no difference), I have just used asm330lhhx since both asm330lhhx and asm330lhhxg1 are automotive sensors. Regards, Lorenzo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
