On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:01:57 +0100 Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2024-01-22 at 09:37 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 11:15:54AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 17:00:47 +0100, Nuno Sa wrote: > > > > The ad9467 will make use of the new IIO backend framework which is a > > > > provider - consumer interface where IIO backends provide services to > > > > consumers. As such, and being this device a consumer, add the new > > > > generic io-backend property to the bindings. > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad9467.yaml | 4 ++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' > > > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): > > > > > > yamllint warnings/errors: > > > > > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: > > > /builds/robherring/dt-review- > > > ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad9467.yaml: io-backends: > > > missing type definition > > > > Are you going to update the GH PR so I can apply adding io-backends? > > > > > > Yes, I can do that. I was thinking you preferred to have the second user so I was > planning in updating only after sending out that series (or Olivier if he ends up > sending his series first). > > Olivier already gave his ack in [1], but I guess you would also like Jonathan's ack > on that PULL right? > > Jonathan, > would that be something you can do? The pull is in [2]... Maybe give your > comments/review in there if any. Looks like there is a comment on Rob still to address about io-backend-names. Otherwise I'm fine with it. J > > > [2]: https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/120 > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/4b1ffdc4-edce-4a69-a30b-45c29741dc2c@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > > - Nuno Sá >