On Fri, 12 Jan 2024 17:40:22 +0100
Nuno Sa via B4 Relay <devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Move to the IIO backend framework. Devices supported by adi-axi-adc now
> register themselves as backend devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx>
A few quick drive by comments whist I wait for a build to finish...
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/adi-axi-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/adi-axi-adc.c
> index 0f21d1d98b9f..741b53c25bb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/adi-axi-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/adi-axi-adc.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>> static int adi_axi_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
...
> @@ -390,37 +205,23 @@ static int adi_axi_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (cl->info->version > ver) {
> + if (*expected_ver > ver) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> "IP core version is too old. Expected %d.%.2d.%c, Reported %d.%.2d.%c\n",
Format doesn't match with later.
> - ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_MAJOR(cl->info->version),
> - ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_MINOR(cl->info->version),
> - ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_PATCH(cl->info->version),
> + ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_MAJOR(*expected_ver),
> + ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_MINOR(*expected_ver),
> + ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_PATCH(*expected_ver),
> ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_MAJOR(ver),
> ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_MINOR(ver),
> ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_PATCH(ver));
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> - indio_dev->info = &adi_axi_adc_info;
> - indio_dev->name = "adi-axi-adc";
> - indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> - indio_dev->num_channels = conv->chip_info->num_channels;
> - indio_dev->channels = conv->chip_info->channels;
> -
> - ret = adi_axi_adc_config_dma_buffer(&pdev->dev, indio_dev);
> + ret = devm_iio_backend_register(&pdev->dev, &adi_axi_adc_generic, st);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = adi_axi_adc_setup_channels(&pdev->dev, st);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - ret = devm_iio_device_register(&pdev->dev, indio_dev);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "AXI ADC IP core (%d.%.2d.%c) probed\n",
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "AXI ADC IP core (%d.%.2d.%d) probed\n",
I'd rip this (I think) unrelated change out to reduce noise in here somewhat.
I'm curious though as it's still %c above.
> ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_MAJOR(ver),
> ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_MINOR(ver),
> ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_PATCH(ver));
> @@ -428,6 +229,8 @@ static int adi_axi_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
