On Wed, 27 Dec 2023 19:39:28 +0200 Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 06:34:25PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 04:34:52PM +0200, Petre Rodan wrote: > > > Fix indentation and whitespace in code that will not get refactored. > > > > > > Make URL inside comment copy-paste friendly. > > > > > return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, > > > - "honeywell,pmin-pascal could not be read\n"); > > > + "honeywell,pmin-pascal could not be read\n"); > > > > As done elsewhere, here and in other similar places fix the indentation > > by making first character on the latter line to be in the same column as > > the first character after the opening parenthesis. > > I triple-checked that I am following the max 80 column rule, the parenthesis > rule and the 'do not split printk messages' rules in all my code in these 10 patches. > precisely so I don't get feedback like this one. > if the parenthesis rule makes the line longer then 80 chars I right-align to > column 80 as seen above. I'm not aware of (and can't immediately see) anything about right aligning to 80 columns. It's fine to align it less if line length is long but normally people go with aligning to one tab more than the start of the block. > that is what I understand from the latest coding style document and that is what > I will follow. > > in this particular case if I were to ignore the 80 column rule we would end up on > column 90 if I were to follow your feedback (open parenthesis is at column 45 > and the error takes 45 chars more). It's fine to do this in the interests of readability. People differ in opinion on what constitutes 'significant readability' and I'd be happy with either a shorter alignment (single tab more than line above) or going over 80 chars in this case. Jonathan > > peter >
