From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> The extra cost of always including the acpi_device_id table is trivial vs the complexity of adding guards or __maybe_unused markings so just stop using the ACPI_PTR() macro. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311160851.FDA4CDVE-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/iio/light/pa12203001.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/pa12203001.c b/drivers/iio/light/pa12203001.c index ed241598aefb..636432c45651 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/light/pa12203001.c +++ b/drivers/iio/light/pa12203001.c @@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver pa12203001_driver = { .driver = { .name = PA12203001_DRIVER_NAME, .pm = &pa12203001_pm_ops, - .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(pa12203001_acpi_match), + .acpi_match_table = pa12203001_acpi_match, }, .probe = pa12203001_probe, .remove = pa12203001_remove, -- 2.42.1
